
Thanks to all who participated in the contest. Here are the entries:
Entries |
|
|---|---|
| 1 | Put commonly used documents on a shared server so that we don't have to print them out and pass them around...this will save a lot of paper, and not to mention printer ink and the need to walk from office to office with copies. |
| 2 | We can pitch in for a wrecking ball to demolish the Forsythe Data Center, the largest consumer of electricity and water in a poorly designed facility. |
| 3 | Require students to submit thesis copies to department as pdf files on CD's rather than as bound paper copies for our departmental library. |
| 4 | We could use GreenPrint enterprise edition software to reduce the number of pages we print and save ink and toner. If this software was available to all of the departments at Stanford we could save thousands of trees and prevent tons of CO2 emissions a year. See http://www.printgreener.com/ for more information. |
| 5 | Our work involves a lot of travel that could be reduced via webinars, while still accomplishing what needs to be done. |
| 6 | There are some simple things within our control that our group can do to get some immediate results:
|
| 7 | Stanford should ask its preferred car rental company to make hybrid cars available to Stanford travelers at preferred rates. If successful, Stanford should then encourage its travelers to request hybrid cars when renting from the car rental company. This puts Stanford's purchasing power and influence behind the move to a less polluting mode of transportation. |
| 8 | Instead of using so many carts on campus, offices could maintain a fleet of bikes to get staff members to meeting across campus. |
| 9 | Stanford needs to stop publishing the annual Stanford Directory. I know of few depts or staff who use the Directory. The on-line Stanford Who system is the way to go. |
| 10 | When purchasing new printers for departments and/or individuals, make sure there is a duplexer capability and the default setting is to print on both sides of the paper. |
| 11 | By using more electronic documentation methods. |
| 12 | My department could create campus-wide “at a glance” maps that show the change in daily average energy or water consumption since the previous year for each Stanford building. A map could be generated for each of six utility services: chilled water, steam, electricity, domestic water, lake water, and waste water if desired. The maps would use colors to highlight the buildings, showing the change (in a series of ranges from 5% to 20%). They could be used by Stanford energy, Zone and building managers to 1) save time determining which buildings should be evaluated further (allowing them to focus on exceptions), 2) eventually analyze trends over a period of years, and 3) possibly as a communications tool for building occupants. Maps could be produced electronically in lieu of hardcopy. Based upon geographic information (GIS) technology, the maps could be generated quickly after initial setup. While a textual list of the exceptions could also be generated, new patterns may be observed, and additional questions may arise that could be analyzed further through the maps. |
| 13 | I think my department could come up with a better system of recycling old hard drives, cd's and misc. cords. We should be more conscious about what goes into the trash can. |
| 14 | I work in the Department of Biochemistry in the Beckman building. Our roof is perhaps 10,000 sq ft and my department could install photovoltaic panels to harness the sun's rays. Last year I submitted this suggestion to the Facilities Operations Utilities people. They said “Generally speaking, it is still more cost-effective to invest in energy efficiency improvements than renewable energy”. I don’t think this approach is cost effective for our environment, people who breathe polluted air, customers of oil companies. Our department, together with the building managers, could do a study to find out (1) the type and number of panels we would need, (2) where to store the inverter and other equipment, (3) how much the panels, inverter, etc and installation would cost, (4) how much rebate we would receive from the PGE or the government, (5) how much we would save yearly. We could use Akeena Solar, which has installed the panels at Stanford’s Synergy House or TDN Electric of Sunnyvale which did the Stanford Reservoir 2 project. From the information I gathered from Reservoir 2, I think the PV system size could be the same, or 30 kW AC. Annual production would be about 51,000 kWh, with 220 BP Solar PV modules (model BP3160S). Normal electrical power would still be fed from PG&E. For the Reservoir 2 project, Stanford received a $135,054 rebate through the Self-Generation Incentive Program administered by PG&E. Excess power produced by the PV array is sold back to PG&E according to the Net Metering (E-Net) rules. The project eliminates 61,000 lbs of carbon dioxide emissions per year according to California Energy Commission estimates. Why not? At the very least, the study would make our department think a lot about doing something to promote renewable energy. |
| 15 | Our university has an excellent shuttle system. More often at off peak hours the buses are running almost empty. A suggestion would be to have electricity run buses. |
| 16 | The Facilities Dept of the University should convert as much as possible of their equipment (like the street/sidewalk sweeper) from Diesel to Propane - safer for the equipment operators and the public. |
| 17 | My department are turning off the lights in the bathrooms and offices when is unused. |
| 18 | As an admin asst, I enter a lot of requests into the iOU system for reimbursements. A long time ago, when Stanford was getting ready to switch from iProcurement to iOU for reimbursements, several training classes were held. At these classes, we were promised that the University would be distributing to all iOU users, plastic sheets in which we could place small receipts to enable them to go through the fax machine without jamming. Well, they never delivered on this promise, and I have to make photocopies of all odd-shaped receipts in order to be able to fax them to iOU as backup. We would save a huge amount of paper and toner if we had these plastic sheets to hold the receipts, especially because they are reusable. |
| 19 | To motivate faculty members and students neutralize the Green House Gas emissions of their frequent business trips, the Geophysics department could implement a Carbon Offset Program, in which the carbon emissions of each faculty air trip would be offset through a retail carbon offset provider. Facts: Every 2,000 miles traveled by air produces a ton of CO2. To offset this same quantity of CO2 one would have to:
A carbon offset program can be arranged through one of dozens of a carbon-offset provider, which achieve net reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through a wide variety of offset methods - from tree planting to investments in renewable energy and energy conservation. These companies sell offsets that range from $5 to $25 per ton of CO2, averaging about $10/ton. For about $650 a year per faculty member, the Geophysics Department can take the first step towards an “environmental conscious” administration by offsetting 65 tons of CO2 generated by its faculty members’ business trips every year. Certainly, going carbon neutral will only be the beginning of a long journey but it will, hopefully, set an example for other departments and schools at Stanford. 1. A Consumers Guide to Retail Carbon Offset Providers. A report from Clean Air, Cool Planet, December, 2006. Retrieved on April 28th, 2007. 2. Cool It! (joint project of Acterra, the Sierra Club's Loma Prieta Chapter, and 3 Phases Energy) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 | I realize that everyone means well, but I think that give-away trinkets that most people throw away, like plastic necklaces, should not be handed out at events like the campus walk. |
| 22 | Stanford programs and departments should stop sending out so many postcards and flyers through interdepartmental mail. Departments should save on paper, printing, money, and labor by publicizing through websites and using email. |
| 23 | Cut copy usage in half. Ask faculty not to print slide handouts but rather put them on the web for students to view. Have a contest amongest departments to see who can cut their copy usage the highest percent. |
| 24 | -For a greener IT at Stanford, department or university should have a printing center/room on each floor of the buildings so we only need one printer per floor. In this way, we can save at least 10 printers on each floor and make everyone gets up and walk 100 yards or more to exercise and retrieve the printing jobs. Be well, Be green! |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 | My department could 1) place composting and recycling bins next to trash cans on every floor and in kitchen areas, 2) stop printing emails/handouts, and use electronic versions, 3) provide an internal department (email) rideshare bulletin board |
| 28 | Turn our head to virtualization - we can save quite a bit of energy if we combine servers/desktops - not to mention space! |
| 29 | Telecommute! Have departments buy into the idea of having administrative personnel telecommute at least one day a week. If certain areas need to have a warm body present, perhaps the personnel could coordinate which days of the week to telecommute. |
| 30 | 1. reward people who commute to work - either by small bonus, or by entering them in a monthly lottery with a small prize. This would be in addition to the incentive the Parking department gives for referring a friend. 2. Find a way to replace the water bottles with a tap water dispenser. 3. Get a double-sided printer. Please. 4. allow flexible hours and work-at-home hours for work that can be done online. |
| 31 | Less food waste, and even more importantly, use catering that has less or no meat (since it is so energy intensive to farm meat as opposed to grains, fruits and vegetables). All catering done on real dishes that are washed right after an event as opposed to thousands of disposable water bottles, plates, forks, etc. Fully encourage biking to work...Stanford could lead the world in cutting emissions if the entire community took real steps to cutting out their car from their commute. |
| 32 | 1. Install motion sensors on lights in public areas. 2. Create a class that will involve students in converting Marguerite to greasel. Use the grease from on-campus eateries. 3. Set aside one shuttle (or perhaps a golf cart at first) to be used as a test vehicle for alternate power. That way students working on alternate power sources can have real world data and feedback on their ideas. |
| 33 | Develop more bike routes in/around/to campus (UCD is a really good example). That way, it will be more convenience for both students and staff to bike to/in campus. This will encourage more people to bike. |